[jdom-interest] Important proposal: Element/Document changes

Brett McLaughlin brett.mclaughlin at lutris.com
Fri Jul 28 08:02:47 PDT 2000


Jason Hunter wrote:
> 
> > Agreed. removeContent(String text) seems stupid to me. I'm +1 on
> > removing it, and since noone ever +1ed its addition, I'd like to
> > get it out of the API. Too confusing, too unreliable.
> 
> It was in the proposal email.  But I'm fine with removing it, and
> removing all the other removeContent() methods besides.  The adds are
> convenient, but the removes are better done using the List.  You agree?

I'd like to see what people think on the other removes (I'm deferring to
the community, in other words), but I am defintely for getting rid of
removeContent(String)

-Brett

> 
> -jh-
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com

-- 
Brett McLaughlin, Enhydra Strategist
Lutris Technologies, Inc. 
1200 Pacific Avenue, Suite 300 
Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA 
http://www.lutris.com
http://www.enhydra.org




More information about the jdom-interest mailing list