[jdom-interest] Question about JDOM & memory usage

James Strachan james at metastuff.com
Tue Nov 14 01:49:19 PST 2000


Check out my proposal on this very subject on the archives...

http://lists.denveronline.net/lists/jdom-interest/2000-November/003613.html

I'll be posting details of an implementation to this list in the next week
or so.

J.

James Strachan
=============
email: james at metastuff.com
web: http://www.metastuff.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Hatalski" <mhatalski at ipnetsolutions.com>
To: <jdom-interest at jdom.org>
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 9:22 PM
Subject: [jdom-interest] Question about JDOM & memory usage


> In Jason Hunter & Brett McLaughlin's JavaWorld article "Easy Java/XML
> integration w/ JDOM", there's a quote:
> "(JDOM)... does not require the entire document to be in memory. The API
> allows
> for future flyweight implementations that load information only when
needed"
>
> I'm wondering what work has/is being done in that area, and what's that
> status?
>
> Alternatively, does anybody have any suggestions for using JDOM in working
> with
> large XML document that are relatively "flat" (i.e. the trees are wide,
not
> deep).  Given some element with a lot of children, it'd be nice to begin
> processing the children before the entire document has been parsed into
> memory,
> and also to be able to release a child's memory once it has been
processed.
>
> Thanks,
> --Mike
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
>
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
t.com
>


If you are not the addressee of this confidential e-mail and any
attachments, please delete it and inform the sender; unauthorised
redistribution or publication is prohibited. Views expressed are those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Citria Limited.



More information about the jdom-interest mailing list