[jdom-interest] Ideas for API changes
Jason Hunter
jhunter at acm.org
Mon Apr 30 19:16:25 PDT 2001
Amy Lewis wrote:
>
> >If Element had an addContent(Node) and Document implemented Node then an
> >Element could add a Document. Similarly, if Document has an
> >addContent(Node) then Document could add more than one element, Document
> >could add Entity objects which don't belong at the Document level.
> >Heck, Documents could add Documents.
>
> *Why* in the name of all the forest gods would you put addContent() on
> the Node interface?
I didn't! Note I wrote Element.addContent(Node) and
Document.addContent(Node).
> Which raises the point that Doctype and Entity are probably not Nodes,
> either.
They are in Brett's mind. Seems some people have visions of Node
dancing in their head, but the visions aren't the same.
> Oh, *give* me the damned knife! If I cut myself, it's *my* problem!
So you're +1 on removing all well-formedness checking?
-jh-
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list