[jdom-interest] SAXHandler's Stack to be protected ?

[Jason Hunter]

> > Just keep in mind, as more of the implementation is exposed, that JSR-102
> > is
> > not just an implementation, but also a specification.  That is, a subclass
> > that conforms to the specification should interoperate with any
> > implementation.
> >

Yes, that's an issue, and the principle reason I don't like making
things protected willy-nilly.  Brett made the decision on the SAXHandler
changes.  I'm hoping he kept the specification aspect of the change in
mind.  :-)

-jh-