[jdom-interest] making SAXHandler class public?

[Mike Hatalski]

At 9:34 PM +0100 2/15/01, Bernard D'Have wrote:
>
>I had this problem and using the SAXHandler directly is the 
>most elegant
>solution to this problem I think. It is probably a lot faster, too.
>
>If there is no fundamental problem with turning the SAXHandler into a
>public class I would like to suggest this change for the JDOM API.
>No changes to the SAXHandler class or the SAXBuilder class are
>necessary!

(+1) on this - I've been doing this already for a customized JDOM version.

--Mike