[jdom-interest] Possible BUG in XercesErrHandler class
Jason Hunter
jhunter at collab.net
Mon Jan 22 15:11:24 PST 2001
This is in DOMBuilder tho.
-jh-
Brett McLaughlin wrote:
>
> You can always set your own error handler:
>
> SAXBuilder builder = new SAXBuilder();
> builder.setErrorHandler(myErrorHandler);
>
> and deal with it yourself...
>
> -Brett
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org
> > [mailto:jdom-interest-admin at jdom.org]On Behalf Of Govy Munamala
> > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:18 PM
> > To: jhunter at collab.net
> > Cc: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> > Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Possible BUG in XercesErrHandler class
> >
> >
> > But the exceptions are already classified as Fatal, Warning and regular
> > errors. The "#ELEMENT# must be declared " exception is being raised as a
> > recoverable error within Xerces and thus being handed over to the error
> > method in XercesErrHandler. Even the
> > org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultErrHandler
> > class is having no op for the methods warning & error.
> >
> > Is there any other solution to identify the type of exception within the
> > programs, because as it stands we cannot introspect the IOException for
> > these ignorable exceptions.
> >
> > If the design decision is to notify every exception, then the fine
> > granularity of the exceptions should be delegated to the calling programs
> > for appropriate action instead of flattening it into a generic
> > IOException.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Govy
> > >From: Jason Hunter <jhunter at collab.net>
> > >To: Govy Munamala <govym at hotmail.com>
> > >CC: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> > >Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Possible BUG in XercesErrHandler class
> > >Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 21:56:31 -0800
> > >
> > >I see. Yes, we rethrow the exceptions because we don't want to ignore
> > >errors. One could argue we don't have to rethrow a warning, but since
> > >DOMBuilder should only be used for building from existing DOM trees, any
> > >warning there should be noted.
> > >
> > >-jh-
> > >
> > >Govy Munamala wrote:
> > > >
> > > > XercesErrHandler is a private class inside
> > > > org.jdom.adapters.XercesDOMAdapter class. So it belongs to JDOM
> > >namespace.
> > > > Sorry for the confusion..
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Govy
> > > >
> > > > >From: Jason Hunter <jhunter at collab.net>
> > > > >To: Govy Munamala <govym at hotmail.com>
> > > > >CC: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> > > > >Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Possible BUG in XercesErrHandler class
> > > > >Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 17:43:25 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >Sounds like a question for Xerces, unless I misunderstand.
> > > > >
> > > > >-jh-
> > > > >
> > > > >Govy Munamala wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Everyone..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I am using JDOM-B5 and Xerces v1.2.3 and found that
> > validation
> > >of my
> > > > >XML
> > > > > > doc using XML/Schema was giving an exception %ELEMENT% must be
> > > > >declared..
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I did a little bit of search for similar messages in
> > the archive
> > >and
> > > > > > couldn't find a resonable answer. So I started debugging
> > the source
> > > > >code.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I found that the methods error & warning in XercesErrHandler
> > >class
> > > > >are
> > > > > > re-throwing the SAXException. The documentation says, the
> > call backs
> > >to
> > > > > > these methods could be ignored in most of the cases! I also found
> > >that
> > > > > > org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultErrHandler ignored the
> > exceptions in the
> > > > >methods
> > > > > > error & warning. Was there any specific design decision
> > involved in
> > > > > > re-throwing the Exceptions??
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am I missing something else here???
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Govy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > To control your jdom-interest membership:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourho
> st.com
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >To control your jdom-interest membership:
> > >
> >
> >http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourho
> st.com
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
> t.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list