[jdom-interest] document encoding

[Andy Clark]

Jason Hunter wrote:
> It would be very valuable to have a builder based on XNI, to provide the
> extra features missing in SAX and probably to gain a little speed boost
> by not going through the SAX layer.  Andy, do you think X2 is far enough
> along to start an XNI builder effort?

I think it's quite usuable now and pretty stable. No Schema
support, unfortunately, though. And, just like JDOM, the XNI
API is subject to change but it if it does, it should be minor 
(knock on wood).

P.S. Is there any particular reason why the mailing list
     doesn't set the Reply-To header to be jdom-interest?

-- 
Andy Clark * IBM, TRL - Japan * andyc at apache.org