[jdom-interest] First pass at Namespace revision[eg]

[Jason Hunter]

Jochen Strunk wrote:
> 
> What was wrong with the use case in the first part of my mail (web
> framework) ? That's a real life example how we use jdom. It would really
> benefit from set namespace. It would also benefit from having support for
> default namespaces.

Here's the original use case, for the record:

--
We are using jdom in the context of a web framework. Different parts of
the 
application deliver parts of an xml document. The framework then
assembles 
these parts, assigning each a unique namespace to avoid conflicts.
--

Jochen, could you explain just a bit more on what you're doing?

-jh-