[jdom-interest] Namespace.hashcode patch
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo at metalab.unc.edu
Thu May 31 07:13:38 PDT 2001
At 8:17 AM -0500 5/31/01, philip.nelson at omniresources.com wrote:
>This will not work. In SOAP and other xml applications the prefix is quite
>significant. A prefix used in one element is part of an attribute value
>later and the processor ties them together that way.
Are you absolutely sure of this? If so, it's a major flaw in SOAP. If
so it's a major flaw in SOAP. Processors should tie things together
based on namespace URIs, not prefixes. Can you provide an example of
what you mean?
>Namespaces without
>prefixes cannot just have a new one added because the default namespace has
>special meaning in xml.
Actually they can. You can change the default namespace on every
element if you care to.
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo at metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) |
| http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list