[jdom-interest] Using NanoXML and JDOM
Paul Libbrecht
paul at mathweb.org
Mon Oct 1 17:00:20 PDT 2001
Sir Dennis,
Funny, i had encountered your benchmarks recently when discovering a
slight bit of dom4j.
Now the definitive thing that's missing in all these is to change the SAX
parser (though it would add a new dimension).
Did you not use some profiling tool for the memory allocation ??
I mean, this should, ideally, measure only the space and time for the
objects and not for the classes, even classloading time.
At least for speed, I saw an enormous difference between Saxon's AElfred
and Xerces (this was the important thing in this case).
Paul
On Mardi, octobre 2, 2001, at 12:17 AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
> http://www.sosnoski.com/opensrc/xmlbench/results.html
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list