[jdom-interest] SAXBuilder setFeature() and setProperty()
exceptions
Elliotte Rusty Harold
elharo at metalab.unc.edu
Wed Apr 17 03:38:56 PDT 2002
At 4:32 PM -0700 4/16/02, Jason Hunter wrote:
>I'd like to hear what other people think. I believe it provides a tiny
>bit of niceness to the API but at the expense of breaking lots of
>existing code (throwing exceptions where there used to be none). While
>I know we're free to do that, I don't like breaking people's code unless
>we can show them a significant improvement in the API. I'm not sure
>this is that significant. I'd like to hear what others think.
>
I'm not sure how many people are really using these methods. The only
thing I've used them for myself is to turn on schema validation; but
if breakage is a big concern maybe a runtime exception might be more
appropriate here? Perhaps an IllegalArgumenntException or some
subclass of it?
--
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo at metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) |
| http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/bible2/ |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
| Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ |
| Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/ |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list