[jdom-interest] streamdom -- middle ground between SAX and DO M

[bob mcwhirter]

Sounds like dom4j's ElementHandler registration API to me.

	-bob

On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Vijay Kumar wrote:

> 
> Does this mean that the document will be parsed by the Sax parser everytime 
> we need to look up a node in the document. I don;t see any other way of
> getting an 
> arbiterary node from a SAX based parser. 
> 
> If you have to parse it everytime from the start it could be really be
> inefficient 
> (time wise) for large XML doc, and if we can;t use it for large docs then
> might as well
> use DOM.
> 
> Am I missing some thing?
> 
> Vijay
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Message: 6
> From: V Lakshman <lak at vlakshman.com>
> Organization: Artificial Intelligence Software
> To: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 10:36:26 -0600
> Subject: [jdom-interest] streamdom -- middle ground between SAX and DOM
> 
> I know most of us hate SAX, but what we don't like
> about SAX is the "low-level" of it.  We would prefer
> DOM, but how can we use DOM on large documents
> or streaming data?
> 
> Well, one way is to have programmers
> process SAX-like events, except that the event-handling
> callbacks get to process entire elements (complete with
> children and attributes, although of-course, no siblings).
> 
> I've written such a package (it's really just one class) --
> called streamdom:
>    http://streamdom.sourceforge.net/    or
>    https://sourceforge.net/projects/streamdom/
> It is currently built on a SAX2 parser and a DOM builder.
> The Java API doc is here:
>   http://streamdom.sourceforge.net/java/api/index.html
> 
> Is there interest in a JDOM version that would
> go in jdom-contrib?  If there is, I could commit it in.
> 
> thanks
> lakshman
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 7
> Reply-To: "Brian Wolf" <brianw at knowledgextensions.com>
> From: "Brian Wolf" <brianw at knowledgextensions.com>
> To: "V Lakshman" <lak at vlakshman.com>, <jdom-interest at jdom.org>
> Cc: "Dave Geoghegan" <daveg at knowledgextensions.com>
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] streamdom -- middle ground between SAX and DOM
> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 10:12:37 -0500
> 
> This is a wonderful idea, and if I may suggest
> further elaboration, it would be nice to have JDOM
> supply a single API, SAX or DOM
> invisible to the programmer, but are real-time,
> and dynamic decisions made by the parser behind the scenes,
> based on system monitoring and resource optimization  scheme
> 
> -Brian
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: V Lakshman <lak at vlakshman.com>
> To: <jdom-interest at jdom.org>
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:36 AM
> Subject: [jdom-interest] streamdom -- middle ground between SAX and DOM
> 
> 
> > I know most of us hate SAX, but what we don't like
> > about SAX is the "low-level" of it.  We would prefer
> > DOM, but how can we use DOM on large documents
> > or streaming data?
> >
> > Well, one way is to have programmers
> > process SAX-like events, except that the event-handling
> > callbacks get to process entire elements (complete with
> > children and attributes, although of-course, no siblings).
> >
> > I've written such a package (it's really just one class) --
> > called streamdom:
> >    http://streamdom.sourceforge.net/    or
> >    https://sourceforge.net/projects/streamdom/
> > It is currently built on a SAX2 parser and a DOM builder.
> > The Java API doc is here:
> >   http://streamdom.sourceforge.net/java/api/index.html
> >
> > Is there interest in a JDOM version that would
> > go in jdom-contrib?  If there is, I could commit it in.
> >
> > thanks
> > lakshman
> > _______________________________________________
> > To control your jdom-interest membership:
> >
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
> t.com
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
> t.com
> 
> End of jdom-interest Digest
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>