[jdom-interest] DOMAdapter propose

[Jason Hunter]

Yes.  Look at the docs (and code if you like) for SAXBuilder.

-jh-

Eugene Karpov wrote:
> 
> What do you mean under "SAX driver class". Is it just a org.xml.sax.XMLReader
> implementation?
> 
> On Wednesday 09 January 2002 21:52, Jason Hunter wrote:
> > With SAX you don't need adapters, you just pass in the driver class.
> > JDOM works with any SAX parser.  Note JAXP isn't even a parser, it's
> > only a parser front-end.
> >
> > -jh-
> >
> > Eugene Karpov wrote:
> > > Cause JDOM do not provide SAXAdapters for parsers other then JAXP.
> > >
> > > ;)
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 08 January 2002 20:46, Jason Hunter wrote:
> > > > Why would you use DOM to build from a URL when you can build faster
> > > > with SAX?
> > > >
> > > > -jh-
> > > >
> > > > Eugene Karpov wrote:
> > > > > I've a propose to add getDocument(java.net.URL url, boolean validate)
> > > > > method to DOMAdapter interface.
> > > > >
> > > > > So, if original parser permit using URL as input, it will make
> > > > > possible to use relative URLs for system DTDs and ENTITIES.
> > > > > Otherwise, it will always possible to convert URL to InputStream.
> > > > >
> > > > > With current DOMAdapter interface I could not use relative system DTD
> > > > > path for XML and corresponding DTD stored in JAR, cause it can not be
> > > > > described in terms of java.io.File.
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > B.R.
> > > > > Eugene
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > To control your jdom-interest membership:
> > > > > http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@
> > > > >your host.com
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > To control your jdom-interest membership:
> > > > http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yo
> > > >urho st.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > B.R.
> > > Eugene
> 
> --
> B.R.
> Eugene