[jdom-interest] jdom and dom4j

[James Todd]

congrats dude. t'was a long haul i'm sure.

- james

Jason Hunter wrote:
> Legally we weren't allowed to progress JDOM as an open source JSR.  So
> "Step 1" had to be to change that.  See
> http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#0326.1 for everything I've done
> on that front as Apache's representative.
> 
> As of *tonight* we've finalized the legal agreement with Sun, and
> Apache's chairman is signing the appropriate legal documents.  (You all
> are the first non-Apache/non-Sun people to hear that.)
> 
> So now with that 10 hours per week obligation getting off my plate and
> the legalese cleared away, we might actually make some progress as a
> JSR.
> 
> -jh-
> 
> Sam wrote:
> 
>>I agree. The fact that the JSR has not moved an inch on the JCP
>>page in a years time (Expert group is being formed) speaks for itslef.
>>
>>JSR's have known to be abandoned in the past... so I wouldnt put
>>too much weight behind this.
>>
>>./s
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>