[jdom-interest] jdom and dom4j
Dennis Sosnoski
dms at sosnoski.com
Wed Jun 19 00:00:09 PDT 2002
I'm not sure I understand the question. Neither JDOM nor dom4j works
with JAXP directly, though they can use JAXP to get a parser.
I'm finding more and more people running into problems with using JAXP
because of multiple implementations on the classpath (especially with
1.4), though, so at this point I recommend that people go directly to
the parser rather than using JAXP unless they really and truly don't
care what parser they end up with.
- Dennis
Sam wrote:
>So does the production relase of dom4j that you mention work with
>JAXP ? If I remember right,it works with only the TrAX API.
>
>./s
>
>
>
>Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
>
>
>>Jason, I know your feelings about this but (AFAIK) the dom4j codebase
>>does not contain any JDOM code so it's inaccurate to describe it as a
>>fork of JDOM.
>>
>>As for the level of press attention, JDOM has had several prominent
>>individuals who have extensively promoted it over the last 2+ years,
>>including numerous articles, presentations, and some books discussing
>>the then-current version. Each of these is out of date, with
>>non-functioning example code, within a few months when the next beta of
>>JDOM is published. People seem to keep buying the books though, so I
>>guess they don't mind. :-) I don't think there's been even one article
>>written on using dom4j, though I've given some brief code examples in my
>>articles and presentations.
>>
>>dom4j *has* been production released, with stable interfaces, for some
>>months now. Many people would consider that a major advantage.
>>
>> - Dennis
>>
>>Jason Hunter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>There's been quite a few charts/tables comparing JDOM to DOM in many
>>>>regards. But typically, the folks constructing the charts/tables
>>>>ignore dom4j completely. dom4j hasn't gotten nearly the press
>>>>attention as JDOM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>That's probably because JDOM came first. dom4j was a fork of JDOM.
>>>Historically, forks tend not to prosper as well as the original
>>>projects.
>>>
>>>-jh-
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>>>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>
>
>
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list