[jdom-interest] A utility Element subclass and a request for API extension
Les Hill
leh at galaxynine.com
Thu Mar 21 10:51:28 PST 2002
jhunter at servlets.com writes:
> Have you thought about just using the ""+ trick?
Actually, yes. Using "" + is better than:
setAttribute("myFloat", Float.toString(someFloat));
But suffers from the same problem in the long run. Doing it once or twice
or ten times is OK, scattering it everywhere begs for a cleaner solution.
> It's not too bad, and probably nicer than making Element larger. One
> goal of JDOM is simplicity.
Not to beat a dead horse, but simplicity does not imply minimalism.
I would argue that extending the API to include utility methods providing
*exactly* the same intention+ with similar but not the same signatures, does
not introduce complexity and promotes use.
As an example of how this kind of utility method is useful, I recently
switched over to 1.4 and started using the 1.4 logging instead of log4j.
Both have the generic log method (signatures not exactly correct for
clarity):
log.log(Level level, String msg)
which writes the message to the log at the specified level. Both also have
utility methods of the form:
log.warning(String msg)
which writes the msg to the log at a warning level. However, when it comes
to exceptions, the log system in 1.4 only provides the generic method:
log.log(Level level, String msg, Throwable thrown)
while log4j provides the generic and the various utility methods:
log.warning(String msg, Throwable thrown)
No difference in functionality: in either case the message is written with a
stack trace at the given level. Amazing difference in daily ease of use.
I offer this as a suggestion as a user of JDOM who is not trying to
manipulate XML documents per se, but rather as a user who is using XML as an
adjunct to everyday applications where attributes are regularly a native
Java type instead of String.
+ In this case setting the value of an attribute -- this would be opposed to
overridden signatures that change intended behaviors.
Regards,
Les Hill
leh at galaxynine.com
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list