[jdom-interest] New builds scripts

[James Todd]

should've included this in my initial message.

:pserver:anonymous at cvs.jdom.org:/home/cvspublic

built fine on debian/2.4.20 against jre 1.4.1_02-b06.

the results look to include 2 failures, w/o looking into the details:

    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestComment
    [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.596 sec
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestDocType
    [junit] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.601 sec
    [junit] TEST org.jdom.test.cases.TestDocType FAILED
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestVerifier
    [junit] Tests run: 17, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.377 sec
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestFilterList
    [junit] Tests run: 27, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.669 sec
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestAttribute
    [junit] Tests run: 20, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.615 sec
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestNamespace
    [junit] Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.639 sec
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestElement
    [junit] Tests run: 68, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.733 sec
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.TestDocument
    [junit] Tests run: 19, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.723 sec
    [junit] TEST org.jdom.test.cases.TestDocument FAILED
    [junit] Running org.jdom.test.cases.input.TestSAXBuilder
    [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.888 sec

hth,

- james

James Todd wrote:

>
> cvs -d :pserver:anonymous at cvs.jdom.org:/home/cvspublic co jdom
>
> built fine, after chmod'ing build.sh, on debian/2.4.20 against jre 
> 1.4.1_02-b06.
>
> no real suprise. i've always thought jdom was one of the more reliable 
> and
> easy to build projects available.
>
> hth,
>
> - james
>
>
> Jason Hunter wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've integrated a bunch of new build improvements including a bunch of
>> great ones from Laurent, and would appreciate if people with access to
>> CVS would do a quick checkout and build to make sure things look 
>> good. Try at least "build", "build samples", and "build javadoc".  I'm
>> especially interested to see how Solaris, Linux, IRIX, and JDK 1.1 users
>> fare since I'm testing with JDK 1.4 Windows.
>>
>> -jh-
>> _______________________________________________
>> To control your jdom-interest membership:
>> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>