[jdom-interest] Toward beta 9

[Rolf Lear]

Please hack it then, and post the patch for analysis ... ;-) (preferably
with performance deltas).

Rolf

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Conover [mailto:sgcjr at yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:36 PM
To: jdom-interest
Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Toward beta 9


> My proposed solution was to make the verifier a separate, optional
> step. When the user creates a document in-memory (as opposed to
> parsing
> a file), then should run the verifier on it when they're done. Many
> people won't do this, and that's their prerogative, but at some point
> down the line some XML parser will find the error when their document
> gets parsed, so it's not the end of the world. (That's why the parser
> is
> required to be so strict, IMO - so the generator doesn't have to be.)

Just to add a user's opinion - I'm in complete agreement with Alex. 
The code I'm writing is 100% unit tested and the verifier step is just
wasted cpu cycles.  If JDOM is delivered like this I for one will just
hack it and make it verification-optional.

Regards,
Steve
_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
t.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://jdom.org/pipermail/jdom-interest/attachments/20030409/24bf5d0f/attachment.htm