[jdom-interest] Faster Verifier Anyone?

[Jason Hunter]

I'd definitely like people to test out this alternate approach.  I don't
think it's something to put in beta 9 though.  We are *so* overdue
already.  :-)

-jh-

> Rolf Lear wrote:
> 
> People want to test out the attached Verifier.
> 
> Worst case is that it has a runtime performance twice as good as
> existing one. Best case I have had is 20 times faster (With data that
> the existing verifier hates).
> 
> Could people with better test/performance resources please run it.
> 
> Jason, could you please nip this in the bud if it is too radical for
> b9.
> Mike, could you maybe put this in to your tests.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Rolf
> 
> <<Verifier.java.gz>>
> 
>                        Name: Verifier.java.gz
>    Verifier.java.gz    Type: unspecified type
>                              (application/octet-stream)
>                    Encoding: base64