[jdom-interest] /Meta-Inf/Info.xml Java Compile Options

[John Jefferson]

Hi Jason,

That is true you could look at the build.xml if you
had the source code, perhaps including the build.xml
in the binary would then be the best solution since
you could then tell from the binary what options were
on, without have to grab the source based on a binary
tag.

JJ


--- Jason Hunter <jhunter at servlets.com> wrote:
> We compile according to the rules in build.xml which
> you can read there 
> about as easily as in info.xml, except in build.xml
> they're guaranteed 
> authoritative and up to date.  :-)
> 
> -jh-
> 
> John Jefferson wrote:
> 
> > It would be nice if you specied what options were
> used
> > when you compile the binary.  I think the info.xml
> > would be a good place for it.  For example,
> > 
> > <compiledwith>
> > <java>
> > <version>1.3.1_06</version>
> > <options>
> > <option name="variable attributes">on</option>
> > <option name="line number attributes">on</option>
> > <option name="source file name">on</option>
> > <option name="local variables">on</option>
> > </options>
> > </compiledwith>
> > 
> > It is sometimes nice to know what options have
> been
> > compiled into the binaries in order to know if you
> > should recompile them for remote debugging or for
> > better performance.
> > 
> > Do you just compile with default options - all on?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > JJ
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> > http://search.yahoo.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > To control your jdom-interest membership:
> >
>
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
>
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com