[jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?

[Frank Sauer]

Apparently, some people are doing exactly that;
they're picking JAXB over JDOM....

-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo at metalab.unc.edu]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 7:47 AM
To: stephan at ncube.de; malachi at tremerechantry.com
Cc: JDOM
Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?


At 8:56 AM +0100 3/14/03, Stephan Trebels wrote:
>Would it be a workable compromise  to have a Namespace.INHERIT for an
>Element as a possible namespace argument?

I wouldn't accept such a compromise. It's ugly. Right now the JDOM 
namespace story is clean and consistent. This proposal says it 
changes depending on whether or not you set Namespace.INHERIT. Too 
many options just create a baroque API that's hard to learn, hard to 
teach, and hard to use. Generally when faced with two possible ways 
of accomplishing something, it's better to pick one than to pick both.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo at metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|           Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava             |
| http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com