[jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?
Bradley S. Huffman
hip at a.cs.okstate.edu
Sun Mar 16 17:27:46 PST 2003
Jason Hunter writes:
> Now, I do think within the "meaning" model it would be handy to have an
> elt.getChild("foo") that didn't require always passing in the same old
> namespace like elt.getChild("foo", SAMEOLDNS). That's what trips up
> most people. Unfortunately we shouldn't treat no namespace the same way
> as a parent namespace. It's inconsistent.
If anything I'd get rid of all methods that default to no namespace so that
one always specifies a namespace, even if it is always NO_NAMESPACE. Sure
it a few more characters but then there is no ambiguity about what is
actually meant. Never sacrific characters for clarity :)
> One option is to have a
> wildcard like elt.getChild("foo", ANY) which follows the XQuery (XPath?)
> precedent of using a * to match any namespace such as
> /*:foo/*:bar/text(). But is ANY better than SAMEOLDNS? Not really.
More information about the jdom-interest