[jdom-interest] SAXOutputter
Chris B.
chris at tech.com.au
Tue Apr 20 10:48:38 PDT 2004
Bradley S. Huffman wrote:
>JDOM already has SAXOutputter.output(List) for outputing fragments.
>
Anything that has start/end Document is by definition not a fragment, as
far as I can see.
>I don't think Chris's use case is a common enough
>
Well I can't prove if it is common, but it seems a very useful thing to
be able to do to me.
>one to warrent another
>method that does basically the same thing as a existing one.
>
But it doesn't do the same thing. If anything the existing output()
methods are redundant since the user can easily call start/endDocument
himself. But uncalling them is not so easy. If people are dealing only
with full Documents, shouldn't they be using output(Document)?
>Plus, there is a workaround.
>
Which is certainly a departure from JDOM's claim to be easy and
intuitive to use.
>But given a choice, I'd rather see the behaviour of
>output(List)/output(Content) changed than the two outputFragment methods
>added.
>
>Brad
>_______________________________________________
>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>
>
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list