[jdom-interest] Last call: getChild/getChildren versus getChildElement/getChildElements
Edward Barrow
edward at copyweb.co.uk
Fri Feb 6 00:26:26 PST 2004
OK, I'm beginning to understand the proposed changes for b10... I haven't
looked at the CVS because I've got code to write; I'm just responding to the
comments on the list that I understand.
Deprecating getChild/getChildren is going to break a lot of my code, and I
guess a lot of other people's code, so yes, Jason will get yelled at and I'd
be much happier if you didn't make any changes that break my code.
But if it makes sense for the longer-term future of the API, better to do it
now than later. I guess a better API in the long term is worth rather more
than a beer - even a foaming litre in a Munich bierkeller. You guys are the
gurus, so it's your call.
A drop-in replacement (changing a method name), so that getChildElement does
exactly the same thing, is just about manageable with search and replace -
it's a lot easier to fix than a change to its behaviour, such as changing the
return type.
Edward Barrow
edward at copyweb.co.uk
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list