[jdom-interest] IOException

[Jason Hunter]

Why don't you get the trace from the IOException and it'll tell you 
who's throwing it and from where.

-jh-

Willie H Armstrong wrote:

> Hello to all,
> 
> I am having a problem with the SaxBuilder throwing an IOException between
> these two lines (369 to 372):
>             // Parse the document.
>             parser.parse(in);
> 
>             return contentHandler.getDocument();
> 
> I am using JDeveloper and had things working (had to 'get rid of' the
> Oracle parser).  I ran the JUnit tests and the input files parsed just
> fine. I added some Cactus/HttpUnit testing structure and the IOException
> started being thrown.  Took the Cactus lib out of the project and it still
> did not work.  The cactus lib was added to the bottom so it should be later
> in the classpath.  In the debugger,  the 'in' variable has an apparently
> valid input source (I take that value and plug it into a browser and it
> finds the file).  While tracing, parser.parse(in) method is called and the
> next thing the debugger shows is the SaxHandler being queried for the
> Locator.  At this point the ContentHandler has what appears to be a valid
> Document in it.  However, it never steps to return
> contentHandler.getDocument().  It proceeds to the catch for the IOException
> (via the finally which sets the contentHandler to null).
> 
> Is this the parser throwing the IOException?  it seems to find the file and
> build a document.
> 
> Cactus.jar shows some JDOM oriented classes.  Could this be a problem?
> 
> Searched the archives under 'cactus' and 'IOException'.  Found a note about
> IOException being 'added'/'revealed' between B8 and B9.
> 
> Thank you for looking at this.
> 
> Regards,
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Willie (Bill) Armstrong
> 860.425.6126 - Norwich office
> 860.961.0998 - Cell
> warmstr2 at csc.com
> mmbtoao - AIM
> MysticBill - Yahoo Messenger
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
> delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
> bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
> agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
> for such purpose.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>