[jdom-interest] JDom and Java5
victor.toni at ebuconnect.de
Tue Feb 26 10:31:43 PST 2008
Mattias Jiderhamn wrote:
> Rolf Lear wrote (2008-02-26 16:16):
>> ... the @suppress would remove the warning like you said.
>> Unfortunately, I don't believe that is enough for an API.
> (Would you care to explain why compiler warnings must be avoided at
> all costs?)
"Avoiding warnings at all costs" sounds a bit strong. When writing a new
API (library, whatever) it's not alway possible to create warning-less code.
In these cases I tend to inspect the code section thoroughly and add
such annotations if possible. It gives a warm fuzzy feeling if the
counter goes down ;-)
And it saves time because 3 months later I don't have to check the same
code again to see if it's just a warning or maybe a WARNING.
More information about the jdom-interest