[jdom-interest] XPath and Jaxen

[Jason Hunter]

It wasn't really discussed.

My guess on why it happened this way is Jaxen was a new project then and decided to provide support for the existing object models rather than ask them to support Jaxen.

-jh-

On Sep 12, 2011, at 2:45 AM, Rolf wrote:

> Indeed, that's the way I see it (and it's also what I am doing to get the testing done.
> 
> It is also what I see as the 'logical' way it should be done, which is also why I am asking... why was it not done that way first time around?
> 
> Rolf
> 
> 
> On 12/09/2011 1:52 AM, Thomas Scheffler wrote:
>> Am 12.09.2011 02:43, schrieb Rolf:
>>> What is the right way to do this migration...?
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> as I understand the Jaxen code correctly you have to implement the
>> Navigator interface to add support to any library.
>> 
>> I would conclude that you have to move the JDOM-Jaxen-Code completely to
>> JDOM. This way there is no circle dependency anymore and no need to fork
>> any version of Jaxen here. As JDOM2 is an different library than JDOM
>> and you are free to do this. JDOM2 would than depend on Jaxen and that's
>> it.
>> 
>> regards,
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> To control your jdom-interest membership:
>> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://www.jdom.org/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com