<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2654.45">
<TITLE>SV: [jdom-interest] Memory problem</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Ok, I go check the latest out. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Thanks guys</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>/Marcus </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Från: Jason Hunter</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Till: Dennis Sosnoski</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Kopia: Marcus Andersson; jdom-interest@jdom.org</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Skickat: 2002-10-17 22:57</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Ämne: Re: [jdom-interest] Memory problem</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> I've also seen this with the beta 8 release. I haven't checking into</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>it</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> in detail, but I thought it was discussed earlier and fixed in the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>CVS.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> At least, that's what I'm hoping...</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Marcus, try the latest in CVS.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Are there plans for a beta 9 soon? </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Would be nice, but I'm absolutely swamped on other activities. I can't</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>promise anything. Volunteers to help pick up slack most welcome.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> Perhaps JDOM should go to a more</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> formal approach for this release, with a defined release candidate and</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> only bug fixes allowed between the RC and actual beta. If people had a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>> couple of days to test the RC it'd help prevent major flaws in the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>beta.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I'm a big fan of building release candidates and letting them soak for a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>week or so before going beta. I recall this b8 performance issue</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>actually snuck in with something we fixed during the soak. It was a</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>one-liner, seemed so innocent. Who knew some JDKs weren't as smart as</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>others about StringBuffer behaviors?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-jh-</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>