[jdom-interest] getChildren() vs getElements()
Alex Chaffee
guru at edamame.stinky.com
Thu Sep 14 05:49:52 PDT 2000
Wasn't there a discussion a few months ago about renaming
getChildren() to getElements()? This Solomon-like solution was
provided by somebody smart, I think James.
Recap:
element.getChildren()
ambiguous; implies that it gets Attributes etc. :-(
element.getChildElements()
too long to type :-(
element.getElements()
brief; no way it can be misinterpreted :-)
Was this just forgotten, or was there a reason to keep getChildren
that I missed?
(We could deprecate getChildren for a few months before the 1.0
release to allow migration.)
- Alex
P.S. This is orthogonal to the current "Element implements List"
discussion. BTW, I think it should not implement List, for this very
reason: there is an ambiguity as to what the members of that list
would be (elements or mixed or elements+attributes or ...)
--
Alex Chaffee mailto:alex at jguru.com
jGuru - Java News and FAQs http://www.jguru.com/alex/
Creator of Gamelan http://www.gamelan.com/
Founder of Purple Technology http://www.purpletech.com/
Curator of Stinky Art Collective http://www.stinky.com/
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list