WG: [jdom-interest] Beta7 Release Candidate #2

[Nestel, Frank]

Hi, 

I'm still using a homebrewed subclass of JDOMs SAXOutputter
to generate SAX events in the particular way I need them
(Finally I had to join that list).

To keep me from patching JDOM sources I'd vote for having the
handler members of SAXOutputter protected instead of private.
I do not see an argument not to do it?

Cheers,
Frank

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jason Hunter [mailto:jhunter at collab.net] 
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 28. Juni 2001 03:33
> An: JDOM Interest
> Betreff: [jdom-interest] Beta7 Release Candidate #2
> 
> I just posted to the web site JDOM 1.0 beta 7 Release Candidate #2. 
> Changes since RC1:
> 
> Fixed the "build javadoc" task to work OK offline
> Fixed the info.xml to say beta7
> Changed getMixedContent() -> getContent()
> Changed setMixedContent() -> setContent()
> Changed the protected lists in Element to be List (not ArrayList)
> Changed JDOMEasterEgg to JDOMAbout
> Added setAttribute(String, String) and   
>       setAttribute(String, String, Namespace)
> Few minor bug fixes which wouldn't have been showstoppers
> 
> Get it here: http://www.jdom.org/dist/source/
> 
> It's also marked with the CVS tag "jdom_1_0_b7_rc2".
> 
> If I don't hear any issues, this will be final.
> 
> -jh-
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/yo
> uraddr at yourhost.com
>