WG: [jdom-interest] Beta7 Release Candidate #2

[Jason Hunter]

"Nestel, Frank" wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm still using a homebrewed subclass of JDOMs SAXOutputter
> to generate SAX events in the particular way I need them
> (Finally I had to join that list).
> 
> To keep me from patching JDOM sources I'd vote for having the
> handler members of SAXOutputter protected instead of private.
> I do not see an argument not to do it?

You haven't explained why *to do it*.  Those private methods call the
specified content handler, which is the place to plug in different
functionality.

-jh-