[jdom-interest] Use Cases (was: Another Element.setName request)
Patrick Dowler
patrick.dowler at nrc.ca
Tue Mar 20 10:07:28 PST 2001
On 20 March 2001 07:00, philip.nelson at omniresources.com wrote:
> > I read through the list archives and the arguments for making
> > the element
> > name immutable. "An Element with a different name is a different
> > Element..." or something like that.
...
> I think the real question has always been, "is there a good enough use case
> for adding an element rename to JDOM". You expressed the difficulty of
> renaming. Why did you need to do it in the first place? What are you
> trying to accomplish?
<grumble>
You know, the problem with requiring a "use case" for infrastructure development
is that you often end up with a system that can only (easily) do the things you
had already invisioned ahead of time. At some point, you hav to just say "I don't
know of a use case, but XYZ makes the system more generla and flexible" and
then later on someone can do something cool with it. If we always demand a
use case before doing something, we have to think of everything now... maybe
that is legit in the business world, but some people just like to do something
cool :-)
</grumble>
--
Patrick Dowler
Canadian Astronomy Data Centre
National Research Council
Victoria, BC
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list