[jdom-interest] Toward beta 9

[Steve Conover]

I shouldn't have spoken so soon.  I will hearby renounce my earlier
opposition to it, especially since it's very poor form to drop in out
of nowhere and be critical.  

JDOM is an excellent api, I don't know what I'd do without it, and
anyway I'd wait until a profiler told me verification was a performance
issue before I started hacking the source (even then, a bad idea for
obvious reasons).

Back to lurkerville...

Regards,
Steve

--- Rolf Lear <rlear at algorithmics.com> wrote:
> I see you are right, it has been done. And a better solution than
> mine,
> sort-of. I had to do the inheritance because I decided not to use the
> org.jdom package (it does belong in the org.jdom.input package).
> 
> If it does not provide "earth shattering" boost to performance, then
> it is
> not the Verification at fault.
> 
> Oh well, that was my daily diversion. I will give it a performance
> test just
> to get some numbers for myself.
> 
> Maybe Steve Conover could have a go as well.
> 
> Rolf
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bradley S. Huffman [mailto:hip at a.cs.okstate.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 4:32 PM
> To: Rolf Lear
> Cc: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Toward beta 9 
> 
> 
> In the jdom-interest archives at
> 
>     http://www.servlets.com/archive/servlet/ReadMsg?msgId=218029
> 
> you'll find the code already done (go over though cause I think
> there's a
> small bug in one of the attribute creation methods).
> 
> Brad
>