[jdom-interest] Toward beta 9

[Vadim.Strizhevsky at morganstanley.com]

If I remember correctly I was also seeing about 10-20% improvements, which
for me is very significant. I will go back and redo my tests and will
publish the results here, but unfortunately I may not get to this for some
time (3-4 weeks) as I'm very busy with other work right now...

-Vadim

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Alex Rosen wrote:

> Presumably the place that you'd see the most improvement is in documents
> with lots of text content (long strings), where the cost of the extra
> verification isn't swamped by the cost of parsing the markup. IIRC we
> found that turning off the verifier sped up some documents by 20%.
>
> Alex
>
> >>> Rolf Lear <rlear at algorithmics.com> 4/9/2003 5:17:25 PM >>>
> I do not get a noticeable improvement using my "normal" activities.
>
> Rolf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rolf Lear [mailto:rlear at algorithmics.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 4:41 PM
> To: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: RE: [jdom-interest] Toward beta 9
>
>
>
> I see you are right, it has been done. And a better solution than
> mine,
> sort-of. I had to do the inheritance because I decided not to use the
> org.jdom package (it does belong in the org.jdom.input package).
>
> If it does not provide "earth shattering" boost to performance, then it
> is
> not the Verification at fault.
>
> Oh well, that was my daily diversion. I will give it a performance test
> just
> to get some numbers for myself.
>
> Maybe Steve Conover could have a go as well.
>
> Rolf
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bradley S. Huffman [ mailto:hip at a.cs.okstate.edu
> <mailto:hip at a.cs.okstate.edu> ]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 4:32 PM
> To: Rolf Lear
> Cc: jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Toward beta 9
>
>
> In the jdom-interest archives at
>
>     http://www.servlets.com/archive/servlet/ReadMsg?msgId=218029
> <http://www.servlets.com/archive/servlet/ReadMsg?msgId=218029>
>
> you'll find the code already done (go over though cause I think there's
> a
> small bug in one of the attribute creation methods).
>
> Brad
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>
>