[jdom-interest] Any Beta 9 RC1 issues?

[Dennis Sosnoski]

We've been through this discussion before on parser reuse. If the 
JavaDocs (as referenced by Elliotte) aren't clear enough here's the link 
to the email confirming reusability of SAX parsers from current SAX 
maintainer David Brownell, as well as from the original author of SAX, 
David Megginson: 
http://lists.denveronline.net/lists/jdom-interest/2002-March/009746.html

If a parser isn't reusable it's broken. If you know of a case where 
there's a problem report it to the authors to be fixed. I'd suggest that 
working around the correct parser behavior on the assumption that some 
parsers will be broken doesn't help anybody.

  - Dennis

Jason Hunter wrote:

>So has anyone found any issues with the Beta 9 RC1?  
>
>The only thing I see outstanding is that we may remove the
>SAXBuilder.setReuseParser() method and just turn reuse on always.  Since
>it's a new method it's better to do that now than later when we'd break
>code.  The big question is, are all SAX parsers conformant in allowing
>reuse?
>
>-jh-
>_______________________________________________
>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>
>  
>