[jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?

[Malachi de AElfweald]

Not exactly.  XML, XHTML, HTML are all versions of SGML.
HTML, XML, and XHTML all have DTDs.
Any strict-HTML page (not loose-HTML, possibly not transitional-html) 
should be valid XML.

Malachi

On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:02:20 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro 
<rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Malachi de AElfweald [mailto:malachi at tremerechantry.com]
>> Sent: 22 March 2003 02:20
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:31:18 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro
>> <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> > All versions of xhtml are in the SAME namespace. That namespace is
>> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
>> >
>> > This has nothing to do with schemas or DTDs. Any time you have an A 
>> tag
>> > that
>> > takes an href tag etc., you should put it in this namespace.
>> >
>> > On
>> >
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml- 
> modularization/dtd_module_rules.html#s_module_nam
> espace
>> > "Note that it is legal and expected for multiple modules to be part of
>> > the same namespace when they are related. All of the XHTML modules, 
>> for
>> > example, are part of the same namespace."
>> >
>> > Robert Munro
>>
>> But, the html4 spec and html3 spec and html2 spec and xhtml spec
>> are all in seperate namespaces.
>
> html is not XML. JDOM doesn't do html, only XML. Only XHTML is XML.
>
> Robert Munro
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom- 
> interest/youraddr at yourhost.com
>
>



--