[jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?

[Robert (Jamie) Munro]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Malachi de AElfweald [mailto:malachi at tremerechantry.com]
> Sent: 24 March 2003 16:34
> To: Robert (Jamie) Munro; jdom-interest at jdom.org
> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?
> 
> 
> Not exactly.  XML, XHTML, HTML are all versions of SGML.
> HTML, XML, and XHTML all have DTDs.
> Any strict-HTML page (not loose-HTML, possibly not transitional-html) 
> should be valid XML.

A chair has legs. I have legs. I must be a chair.

Robert Munro


> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:02:20 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro 
> <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Malachi de AElfweald [mailto:malachi at tremerechantry.com]
> >> Sent: 22 March 2003 02:20
> >>
> >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:31:18 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro
> >> <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > All versions of xhtml are in the SAME namespace. That namespace is
> >> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
> >> >
> >> > This has nothing to do with schemas or DTDs. Any time you have an A 
> >> tag
> >> > that
> >> > takes an href tag etc., you should put it in this namespace.
> >> >
> >> > On
> >> >
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml- 
> > modularization/dtd_module_rules.html#s_module_nam
> > espace
> >> > "Note that it is legal and expected for multiple modules to 
> be part of
> >> > the same namespace when they are related. All of the XHTML modules, 
> >> for
> >> > example, are part of the same namespace."
> >> >
> >> > Robert Munro
> >>
> >> But, the html4 spec and html3 spec and html2 spec and xhtml spec
> >> are all in seperate namespaces.
> >
> > html is not XML. JDOM doesn't do html, only XML. Only XHTML is XML.
> >
> > Robert Munro
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To control your jdom-interest membership:
> > http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom- 
> > interest/youraddr at yourhost.com
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  
>