[jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?
Malachi de AElfweald
malachi at tremerechantry.com
Tue Mar 25 07:58:52 PST 2003
You are missing the point entirely.
HTML (v2, v3, v4), XHTML, and possibly some others all have the concept of
the "A HREF" tag. Therefore, the most object-oriented
approach would be to have a single class that extends URL that serializes
itself as an A HREF tag. It doesn't matter which of those namespaces it
uses, it means exactly the same thing. It would be better to write a
single
class to handle it, then to write a class for each namespace that all do
exactly the same thing.
That was the whole point all along regarding this. People get off track
because
they like the way they do it and they don't want to hear any other
opinions. My
whole point regarding the A HREF thing was that sometimes you want the same
behavior
for different namespaces. Period. Give it a rest.
Malachi
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 17:24:12 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro
<rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Malachi de AElfweald [mailto:malachi at tremerechantry.com]
>> Sent: 24 March 2003 16:34
>> To: Robert (Jamie) Munro; jdom-interest at jdom.org
>> Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Is JDOM dying?
>>
>>
>> Not exactly. XML, XHTML, HTML are all versions of SGML.
>> HTML, XML, and XHTML all have DTDs.
>> Any strict-HTML page (not loose-HTML, possibly not transitional-html)
>> should be valid XML.
>
> A chair has legs. I have legs. I must be a chair.
>
> Robert Munro
>
>
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:02:20 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro
>> <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Malachi de AElfweald [mailto:malachi at tremerechantry.com]
>> >> Sent: 22 March 2003 02:20
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 17:31:18 -0000, Robert (Jamie) Munro
>> >> <rjmunro at arjam.net> wrote:
>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> > All versions of xhtml are in the SAME namespace. That namespace is
>> >> > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml
>> >> >
>> >> > This has nothing to do with schemas or DTDs. Any time you have an A
>> >> tag
>> >> > that
>> >> > takes an href tag etc., you should put it in this namespace.
>> >> >
>> >> > On
>> >> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml->
>> modularization/dtd_module_rules.html#s_module_nam
>> > espace
>> >> > "Note that it is legal and expected for multiple modules to be part
>> of
>> >> > the same namespace when they are related. All of the XHTML modules,
>> >> for
>> >> > example, are part of the same namespace."
>> >> >
>> >> > Robert Munro
>> >>
>> >> But, the html4 spec and html3 spec and html2 spec and xhtml spec
>> >> are all in seperate namespaces.
>> >
>> > html is not XML. JDOM doesn't do html, only XML. Only XHTML is XML.
>> >
>> > Robert Munro
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > To control your jdom-interest membership:
>> > http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom->
>> interest/youraddr at yourhost.com
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-
> interest/youraddr at yourhost.com
>
>
--
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list