[jdom-interest] Speed/memory Improvement from b8 to b9 but no 1.1.x support

[Rolf Lear]

See the bug report:
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4724129.html

Or, have a look at this report on the consequences for JDom b8.

http://www.servlets.com/archive/servlet/ReadMsg?msgId=340371&listName=jdom-i
nterest

Rolf

-----Original Message-----
From: New, Cecil (GEAE) [mailto:cecil.new at ae.ge.com]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 8:54 AM
To: 'Mike Brenner'; 'jdom-interest at jdom.org'
Subject: RE: [jdom-interest] Speed/memory Improvement from b8 to b9 but
no 1.1.x support


(I know this has been discussed before, but I don't remember the exact
conditions.)

Is the memory leakage linked to a specific version(s) of the java vm?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Brenner [mailto:mikeb at mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2003 7:29 AM
Cc: jdom-interest at jdom.org
Subject: Re: [jdom-interest] Speed/memory Improvement from b8 to b9 but
no 1.1.x support


Hear! Hear!

Of course, along with the speed and memory utilization, 
web applications no longer require us to restart the web 
app serer every 3 hours due to the b8 memory leakages. 

In one case tomcat has been running continuously since b9-rc2 
without needing a restart yet! In another case 0c4j instead
of tomcat.


"Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)" wrote:
> ... I just recently switched from b8 to b9 and experienced a huge
improvement
in speed and memory utilitization.  On a typical SAXBuilder.build of an
existing
120kb XML would take 1.5s and 31MB of memory using b8.  With b9, the load
time
dropped to <0.1s and memory footprint is ~500KB.  Kudos to the JDOM for
major
tweaking/bugfixing.

_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
t.co
m
_______________________________________________
To control your jdom-interest membership:
http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhos
t.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://jdom.org/pipermail/jdom-interest/attachments/20030509/d774f136/attachment.htm