[jdom-interest] getChild() convenience methods

[Vadim.Strizhevsky at morganstanley.com]

I second this comment.

-Vadim

On 30 May 2003, Dave Bartmess wrote:

> OK, I've been watching this discussion for a while now.
>
> My main question is, will the beta cycle (and possibly the alpha cycle
> as well) start all over now that the API has been changed so
> drastically?
>
> IMHO, and I'm a software configuration manager, and this is more within
> my purview than the actual development, this should start a complete new
> cycle of testing. The API has been substantially changed, and despite
> whether a particular name has been changed, a LOT of coding changes have
> gone in.
>
> I'm sorry, but for now, I'm leaving jdom at beta9 on my system, until
> the current flux dies out. Having this many changes at a 10th beta is
> not good, and is almost certain to cause problems, which I can't afford
> at this time on my own projects.
>
> Not to say that I'm against any of the changes, but I just feel this is
> a major change, therefore needing a LOT more testing than a 10th beta
> will accomplish...
>
> --
> David A. Bartmess
> Software Configuration Manager / Sr. Software Developer
> eDingo Enterprises
> http://edingo.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> To control your jdom-interest membership:
> http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>
>