[jdom-interest] Feature Request
Jeremy.Prellwitz at siras.com
Jeremy.Prellwitz at siras.com
Thu Feb 19 17:16:34 PST 2004
This is what I was trying to describe, just without mentioning it as
specifically/consisely as you just did. I wouldn't have brought up my own
little issue if I didn't think that passing in your own XMLReader instance
could offer usefulness to others. It seems like a simple enough change to
the SAXBuilder.java class, and conincidently, it would smooth out my code a
little bit. :-)
-jeremy
>It seems to me that supplying your own XMLReader is a sensible enough
>activity that it deserves a proper method or constructor in SAXBuilder
>to pass it in.
"Chris B."
<chris at tech.com.a
u> To
Jason Hunter <jhunter at xquery.com>
02/19/2004 05:00 cc
PM Jeremy.Prellwitz at siras.com,
jdom-interest at jdom.org
Subject
Re: [jdom-interest] Feature Request
Jason Hunter wrote:
> Sounds like nekohtml is being a Bad Citizen, but I think you can do
> exactly what you want by subclassing SAXBuilder and overriding
> createParser().
It seems to me that supplying your own XMLReader is a sensible enough
activity that it deserves a proper method or constructor in SAXBuilder
to pass it in.
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list