[jdom-interest] Feature Request

[Chris B.]

As much as I think its a good idea, how would it help you directly, 
since NekoHTML doesn't seem to conform to XMLReader? (Which seems to be 
its problem).


Jeremy.Prellwitz at siras.com wrote:

>This is what I was trying to describe, just without mentioning it as
>specifically/consisely as you just did.  I wouldn't have brought up my own
>little issue if I didn't think that passing in your own XMLReader instance
>could offer usefulness to others.  It seems like a simple enough change to
>the SAXBuilder.java class, and conincidently, it would smooth out my code a
>little bit. :-)
>
>-jeremy
>
>
>
>  
>
>>It seems to me that supplying your own XMLReader is a sensible enough
>>activity that it deserves a proper method or constructor in SAXBuilder
>>to pass it in.
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>                                                                           
>             "Chris B."                                                    
>             <chris at tech.com.a                                             
>             u>                                                         To 
>                                       Jason Hunter <jhunter at xquery.com>   
>             02/19/2004 05:00                                           cc 
>             PM                        Jeremy.Prellwitz at siras.com,         
>                                       jdom-interest at jdom.org              
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       Re: [jdom-interest] Feature Request 
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>Jason Hunter wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Sounds like nekohtml is being a Bad Citizen, but I think you can do
>>exactly what you want by subclassing SAXBuilder and overriding
>>createParser().
>>    
>>
>
>
>It seems to me that supplying your own XMLReader is a sensible enough
>activity that it deserves a proper method or constructor in SAXBuilder
>to pass it in.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To control your jdom-interest membership:
>http://lists.denveronline.net/mailman/options/jdom-interest/youraddr@yourhost.com
>  
>