[jdom-interest] performance on tonights CVS
David D. Lucas
ddlucas at lse.com
Sun Feb 24 01:42:53 PST 2002
I pulled down the CVS source tonight and wanted to know how the current
JDOM is handling the parsing as compared to JDOM beta 7. I used
different SAX parsers and the samples.TestXMLOutput (slightly modified)
to run a few repeating tests.
What I have found seems to indicate that outputting a JDOM tree to XML
for a large file (1.85MB) is about 3 times faster now than JDOM beta 7.
Great job!!!
However, something in the way SAX is being used has impacted my Builder.
build performance which has slipped some 40% in the wrong direction.
I have not profiled it yet, but was wanting to know if anyone has a
quick explaination or suggestion on how to get it back up to beta 7
build speeds.
As a side note, it looks like memory usage is a bit better in the
current CVS snapshot than beta 7.
Any help would be appreciated. I know that 1.85MB XML is a bit large,
but that is what my client wants. We are processing some large
MQSeries messages and are using JDOM to manipulate the information.
Thanks in advance,
Dave
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| David Lucas mailto:ddlucas at lse.com |
| Lucas Software Engineering, Inc. (740) 964-6248 Voice |
| Unix,Java,C++,CORBA,XML,EJB (614) 668-4020 Mobile |
| Middleware,Frameworks (888) 866-4728 Fax/Msg |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| GPS Location: 40.0150 deg Lat, -82.6378 deg Long |
| IMHC: "Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life." |
| IMHC: "I know where I am; I know where I'm going." <>< |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Notes: PGP Key Block=http://www.lse.com/~ddlucas/pgpblock.txt
IMHO="in my humble opinion" IMHC="in my humble conviction"
All trademarks above are those of their respective owners.
More information about the jdom-interest
mailing list